From ICD-10 to ICD-11: What Healthcare Leaders Need to Know

Last updated on
May 9, 2025

The ICD Journey: From 10 to 11

What Made ICD-10 a Big Leap?

When ICD-10 replaced ICD-9, it was more than a minor update—it was a revolution. With 68,000 codes compared to ICD-9’s 13,000, it introduced the granularity healthcare systems needed to better document diagnoses and procedures. But while it solved many challenges of the time, the healthcare world has since outgrown it.

What’s Driving ICD-11 Adoption?

Released by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2019, ICD-11 addresses the pain points that have emerged with ICD-10:

Interoperability: ICD-11 aligns seamlessly with digital tools like electronic health records (EHRs), AI platforms, and international standards like SNOMED CT.

Ease of Use: Despite its depth, ICD-11 simplifies coding by reducing redundancies and improving logical code structures.

Future-Proofing: Its digital-first design ensures it will evolve alongside modern technologies.

ICD-11 isn’t just a better coding system—it’s a smarter one, designed for the era of big data, AI, and global connectivity.

Who’s Leading the ICD-11 Charge?

icd 11 leaders

Adoption of ICD-11 is already underway globally:

United Arab Emirates (UAE): A regional leader, the UAE has made significant progress in integrating ICD-11 into its healthcare infrastructure.

European Countries: Nations like Belgium and the Netherlands are at the forefront of piloting ICD-11 in national health systems.

Asia: Japan is exploring phased adoption, leveraging ICD-11’s compatibility with digital health initiatives.

Meanwhile, in the U.S., ICD-10 remains the standard, but the delay provides a window for preparation. The transition to ICD-11 is inevitable—it’s just a matter of time.

Why This Matters to Healthcare Leaders

ICD-11 isn’t just about coding accuracy—it’s about the business of healthcare. Consider these points:

1. Financial Impact

Coding errors cost U.S. healthcare systems $36 billion annually (Journal of AHIMA).

ICD-11’s improved structure reduces ambiguity, meaning fewer errors, faster reimbursements, and lower administrative costs.

2. Global Relevance

As countries adopt ICD-11, staying on ICD-10 could make international collaboration more difficult. Whether it’s research partnerships or global patient care, ICD-11 ensures your organization isn’t left behind.

3. Preparing for Change

Early preparation reduces the disruption of transitions. Organizations investing now in ICD-11-compatible systems, staff training, and automation tools will save costs and avoid rushed implementation later.

Lessons from ICD-10: What We Learned

The transition to ICD-10 wasn’t without its challenges. Some organizations faced:

High Implementation Costs: Upgrading systems and retraining staff added up.

Coding Backlogs: Many organizations underestimated the complexity of the shift, leading to delays in billing and reimbursement.

These lessons should inform how healthcare leaders approach ICD-11. The good news? Technology has advanced significantly since the ICD-10 transition, making this shift smoother for those who plan ahead.

Steps to Get Ahead

Leverage Automation and Integration

Manually mapping codes is labor-intensive and error-prone. Automation tools, like API solutions for diagnostic code mapping, simplify the process and reduce errors. These tools can handle both ICD-10 and ICD-11 codes, ensuring a seamless transition.

For example, our solution integrates directly with EHR systems and uses machine learning to map unstructured clinical data to standardized codes.

Train Your Teams Early

The complexity of ICD-11 requires training not just for coders but for clinicians and administrators. Investing in early education will ease the transition and avoid disruptions later.

Adopt Interoperable Systems

ICD-11 emphasizes global interoperability. Systems that support standards like HL7 and FHIR are better equipped for this transition, enabling seamless data exchange across platforms.

Why This Is an Investment, Not a Cost

Compliance can feel like a burden, but it’s also an opportunity. ICD-11 offers:

Improved Analytics: More precise codes mean better data for decision-making.

Higher Reimbursement Rates: Accurate coding ensures claims are approved faster and with fewer denials.

Operational Efficiency: Automated tools reduce administrative workloads, allowing teams to focus on patient care.

As the saying goes: “The cost of preparation is always lower than the cost of falling behind.”

Conclusion: Future-Proof Your Organization

ICD-11 isn’t just the next version of coding—it’s a roadmap to the future of healthcare. For leaders, this is the moment to take action: review your systems, invest in tools and training, and prepare for a smoother transition. Waiting until the last minute will only amplify costs and risks.

The shift from ICD-10 to ICD-11 isn’t just a change in codes; it’s a transformation in how healthcare organizations operate and collaborate on a global scale. By acting now, you’re not just staying compliant—you’re building a foundation for smarter, more efficient healthcare.

Data Security in Patient Care Management Software: What You Need to Know

Smart systems don’t just manage care—they protect it. Explore how today’s best platforms embed data security into every step of the patient journey.
Read post

Top 10 Features to Look for in Patient Care Management Software

This article walks healthcare providers, clinic managers, and decision-makers through the ten essential features of effective Patient Care Management Software. Instead of focusing on flashy tech specs, it highlights real-world problems: fragmented data, communication gaps, compliance struggles, and burnout. Each feature is explained with role-based use cases, micro-insights, and clear value for both patient outcomes and operational efficiency. It positions the software not as a gadget, but as a dependable partner in delivering better, safer, and more coordinated care. Ideal for practices seeking clarity, connectivity, and scalability in their tech stack.
Read post

The Strategic ROI of Patient Registries in Value-Based Care

Patient registries might not be flashy, but they’re foundational to delivering smarter, more profitable value-based care. From identifying high-risk patients to tracking outcomes and supporting reimbursement, registries are the unsung heroes that help teams see clearly, act faster, and get paid for real results. This blog explores why investing in registry infrastructure isn’t just strategic—it’s essential.
Read post

Patient Registries vs. EHR Modules: When Do You Need a Standalone System?

While EHRs are essential to daily care, they aren’t built for longitudinal tracking, research-grade data capture, or flexible cohort management. This post explores when a dedicated patient registry adds real value over using basic modules inside your EHR—and what that means for scalability, compliance, and data quality.
Read post

Scaling Patient Registries Across Multisite Health Systems: What to Plan For

As health systems expand across geographies and care environments, the need for unified, scalable patient registries grows more urgent. This blog explores what healthcare leaders should consider when planning registry deployment at scale—from data consistency and governance to integration, access models, and long-term sustainability.
Read post

From Notes to Codes: A Simple Walkthrough of Diagnostic Code Mapping with Bioteknika

This blog explores Bioteknika’s diagnostic code mapping interface, which uses a hybrid AI approach to suggest ICD-10 codes based on confidence scoring. Includes real input/output examples and a breakdown of both upload-based and manual entry workflows.
Read post